Thermogravimetric Studies on Non-isothermal Oxidative Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials

Introduction

Bamboo is a versatile, fast growing and renewable non-timber forest product which grows in comparatively hot and humid climates of subtropical and temperate zones of various parts of earth. Undesirable consequences of population growth in countries like India, demands sustainable and biodegradable materials for daily applications and where bamboo comes in to play.  Despite of its environmental importance and as a bioenergy feedstock, wide varieties of industrial applications of bamboo have been put forward by researchers such as rayon, plywood, reinforced boards, laminated flooring and food. High-performance adhesives and fiber engineering can be employed for durable lignocellulosic composites with high strength. Lignocellulosic biomass can also be incorporated with plastics, glass, metals and synthetic compounds to manufacture diverse products. It is possible to combine more than one materials in a synergic way so that a new engineering system can be evolved which is better than the constituent components with enhanced dimensional stability.¹

The studies reveal that the bamboo consists of holocellulose (60-70%), cellulose (26-43%), hemicellulose and lignin (each amounted to about 20-30%), pentosans (20-25%), ash (1.7-5%), silica (~0.7%) and minor constituents like resins, tannins, waxes and trace amounts of inorganic salts. The composition of bamboo culm are comparable to that of common hardwood, but with greater alkaline extract, silica and ash contents.² Lignocellulosic materials decompose thermally by two different mechanisms irrespective of the variations in their composition. The first mechanism, often found below 300˚C is associated with breakage of polymeric chains by bond fission, dehydration, formation of free radicals, carbonyl, carboxyl and hydroperoxide groups and release of gases such as CO and CO₂. Finally the reactive carbonaceous char is yielded. Oxidation of the carbonaceous char and combustible volatile gasses leads to smoldering combustion and flaming combustion respectively.^{3, 4} The second mechanistic pathway, which operates above 300˚C, mainly consists of the fission of secondary bonds leading to some intermediate systems such as anhydromonosaccharides, which degrades into smaller systems, giving carbonized products.⁵ Temperature beyond 450°C, the char is predominant, and further decomposition results in the formation of volatiles and is designated as afterglow. The rate of formation of carbonaceous char decreases and tar forming reactions increases above 300˚C. The tar comprises of anhydro sugar derivatives which hydrolyses to reducing sugars. Levoglucosan and other volatile products evaporates in endothermic reaction which is followed by the exothermic combustion reactions.⁶ 

The high percentage of volatiles is released from cellulose, which possess lowest heat of combustion and char yield. The whole wood releases next level of volatiles with higher heat of combustion and percentage of char formation. Bark exhibits higher heat of combustion as compared to wood with a high char and volatiles yield. Heat of combustion of lignin is the highest, giving out maximum char yield and the lowest yield of volatiles.⁴

Several researchers focused on the thermal behaviour of industrially useful wood species. But the thermal decomposition characteristics of bamboo species are less studied and not compared among species and the field is yet to be explored. Wiedemann studied the wood components in relation to the growth period of a tree using different thermoanalytical techniques.⁷ The composition of the stem varies according to the age, climate, soil constitution etc. So in order to make the study more scientific and reproducible, the bamboo samples were received from the bamboo plantation of JNTBGRI Thiruvananthapuram, India and the ten species of bamboo trees were of more or less same age and growing in the same terrain with similar growing conditions. The main objectives of this study is to increase the knowledge of the complex chemical mechanisms involved in the thermal degradation of lignocellulosic biomass giving special attention to ten varieties of bamboo. Such a comparison is not made elsewhere till the date.

Materials and Methods

The present investigation aims to assess the thermal stability of ten species of bamboo such as cephalostachyum pergracile (CP), bambusa pallida (BP), dendrocalamus brandisii (DB), dendrocalamus strictus (DS), dendrocalamus hamiltoni (DH), dendrocalamus gigantus (DG), dendrocalamus membranaceus (DM), bambusa nutans (BN), bambusa bambos (BB) and bambusa vulgaris (BV). The ten varieties of bamboo are approximately five years of age and all are cultivated in identical climate and soil conditions. The bamboo samples are collected from approximately three feet above the ground level of plant. The mode of preparation to obtain samples of each bamboo species is as follows. bamboo culms were split into pieces of 2.5 cm wide using a chisel. They were cut into small pieces about 8.0 cm long for the milling process. The separated bamboo strips were kept in water for 48 hours and then strips were removed and sliced longitudinally to extract the fibres. The clean samples are air dried at ambient laboratory conditions for approximately 10 days. Milling and homogenization was done to minimise the errors of thermal analysis procedure and get an average of each system. Bamboo samples were milled by a standard Whiley mill with a screen of 2 mm. Sieving was performed so as to get powder, approximately 40 (400 microns) – 60 (250 microns) mesh size (American Standard ASTM – E 11). Small particle size is preferred to check serious mass and heat transfer limitations. The wood powder (approximately 500 mg) of ten varieties of bamboo are separately treated in 10 mL distilled water, stirred and maintained at room condition for forty eight hours and oven dried at 70 °C.

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted in a Mettler Toledo thermal analyser. A linear heating rate of 10 Kmin^-1 in dry dynamic air with a consistent flow rate (60 mLmin^-1) is employed for all the samples in the temperature range of ambient to ~800 °C. For the interpretation of thermal behaviour, the data obtained from the TG, DTG (derivative thermogravimetry) and DTA (differential thermal analysis) experiments were used. Thermal decomposition kinetics and mechanism of samples were also investigated using these data.

Results and Discussion

Phenomenological Studies of Different Bamboo Species

The TG, DTG and DTA profiles of all the ten varieties of bamboo have been presented in Fig. 1 to 10. The data of the phenomenological aspects for the ten species of bamboo are tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1: Phenomenological data for the thermal decomposition of ten bamboo species

Sample	Plateau in TG ( 0C)	Stage	Peak temperature in DTG ( 0C)	Peak width in DTG( 0C)	Peak temperature in  DTA   ( 0C)	Peak width in DTA              ( 0C)	Residue
Cephalostachyum pergracile	Up to 230   After 480	I	296	250-320	314	300-320	29.5
		II	398	370-420	402	380-420
		III	444	440-460	446	430-460	4.2
Bambusa pallida	Up to 240     After 480	I	278	240-310	312	280-330	32.3
		II	398	380-430	404	380-430
		III	450	430-470	457	430-490	6.5
Dendrocalamus brandisii	Up to 230     After 470	I	286	240-320	312	280-350	33.3
		II	409	380-420	413	380-440
		III	452	440-460	458	440-480	4.3
Dendrocalamus strictus	Up to 240   After 470	I	323	290-340	334	320-360	39.7
		II	434	400-450	437	410-440
		III	463	460-480	466	450-470	3.8
Dendrocalamus hamiltoni	Up to 240     After 480	I	289	250-320	319	280-340	40.9
		II	414	370-430	418	380-420
		III	456	440-470	459	440-470	5.5
Dendrocalamus gigantus	Up to 220   After 470	I	289	250-320	314	280-340	38.1
		II	402	380-420	408	380-430
		III	448	430-460	449	440-470	7.5
Dendrocalamus membranaceus	Up to 240   After 450	I	323	290-340	333	310-360	38.0
		II	436	410-450	446	430-450	4.7
Bambusa nutans	Up to 240 After 460	I	321	290-330	321	300-370	35.8
		II	426	390-430	436	420-440
		III	–	430-450	456	440-460	3.8
Bambusa bambos	Up to 240   After 490	I	320	290-330	331	300-350	39.9
		II	424	390-430	427	390-430
		III	457	430-460	458	450-470	4.7
Bambusa vulgaris	Up to 220 After 470	I	276	260-310	306	260-320	34.4
		II	441	410-450	443	420-470	8.5

(mass ~ 3mg, f = 10⁰C min^-1, atmosphere = dynamic air)

Since lignocellulosic material is a heterogeneous mixture of various constituent compounds, different fractions decompose at different temperature regimes. Maximum pyrolyzable fraction is attributed to biomass at a given temperature, independent of the time. So we depend upon global mass loss kinetics. Global kinetics can be extended for modeling complex solid state decomposition reactions where the complete spectrum of the hydrocarbon decomposition reactions are irrelevant. Global pyrolysis kinetics applied to bamboo is used to previse the overall rate of mass loss from the sample. Even if so many volatile products are discharged during decomposition, global kinetics shine light upon the key mechanistic stages in the overall decomposition process.

All the bamboo samples show a very small mass loss at 70 – 110°C and are due to desorption of moisture. In the case of CP, mass loss of 3.3% is observed below ~110 ^oC (Fig. 1). Before the active mass loss starts, small endothermic peak or region is found and is due to the melting or softening of waxy constituents in the sample. The threshold temperature for active wood pyrolysis for the bamboo species, CP is observed at 230°C. All the samples exhibit the onset temperature for the first mass loss stage in between 220 – 240°C. Except DM, BN and BV all other species undergo decomposition in three stages, and DM, BN and BV complete the decomposition process in two distinct stages.

Figure 1: TG-DTA profile of CP Click here to View Figure

The sample of CP shows three DTG peaks with maxima at 296, 398 and 444°C. The largest DTG curve is found for the first decomposition stage. Hemicellulose and lignin fractions are degraded in the temperature regime 200 – 300 °C and 225- 450 °C, respectively. Dehydration reactions above 200°C are responsible for the decomposition of hemicellulose and lignin which produce high char quantity. Thermal degradation of cellulose can also be accelerated in presence of acids and oxygen. Volatilisation of laevoglucosan from cellulose is probably involved in the first stage of decomposition.

Of the three major lignocellulosic components, lignin fraction starts decomposing at lower temperature (160-170 ^oC). But the pyrolysis happens in an extensive temperature range with relatively low rates until ~900 ^oC. So, in the decomposition of biomass materials, lignin is mainly responsible for char production. Since hemicellulose also starts decomposing at lower temperatures compared to cellulose, it makes an appreciable contribution to the formation of char. Sharp exothermic DTA peaks are found at 314, 402 and 446 °C. For the first stage, especially, in the range from the commencement of the reaction to maximum mass loss rate, oxidation is weakly exothermic as evident by the difference between the DTG peak (296 ^oC) and DTA maximum (314 ^oC). In presence of air, the flaming of volatiles precedes, and produces high amount of heat than the glowing of solid residue. Since an oxidative atmosphere is maintained, the initial endothermic pyrolysis reaction is superimposed by strong exothermic oxidation. For the second and third stages the DTG maxima coincide with the corresponding DTA peaks. This indicates that the point of maximum mass loss rate is associated with the decomposition and oxidative gasification of char which is highly exothermic in nature. The sample of CP gives a char residue of 29.5% at the end set of the primary stage of pyrolysis. Approximately 67% of the lignocellulosic material excluding the initial moisture content was lost as volatiles in the oxidative atmosphere below ~360 ^oC. In the temperature range 240 – 360 ^oC, cellulose and hemicellulose fractions of bamboo are somewhat completely consumed. Above 410 ^oC, the mass loss rate is decreased and tends to reach constant mass. The major biomass components are almost completely decomposed below the final DTG peak commences and 11% of the sample remains at this point, which is stable char containing minor amounts of lignin, ash and decomposition products of cellulose and hemicellulose. The third stage of decomposition is indicated by the narrow DTG peak width of 430 – 460 ^oC and a mass loss of 5.0% is observed for this stage. The exothermic peak towards the end of the decomposition process is due the glowing combustion of high molecular weight chars and decomposition is complete at ~480^oC leaving char residue of 4.2%. The similar observations were shown by Amutio et.al., in the oxidative pyrolysis of the bamboo species,where devolatization and char combustion occurs in the range 209 – 315 °C and 315 -333 °C respectively.⁸ Compared to inert atmosphere, the oxidizing atmosphere accelerates the devolatilization process. In thermogram, a peak which ends at a lower temperature has a shoulder due to char combustion. In the thermogram of  forest pinewood waste, the main peak ends at lower temperature and another second peak is found at higher temperature. Lu and Chen pointed out similar results in another experiment involving bamboo species.⁹

The sample of BP shows no significant loss of mass till ~220^oC, and thereafter, it decomposes in three stages designated by DTG maxima at 278, 398 and 450^oC (Fig. 2). The peak temperature of main decomposition stage for BP is reduced by 18^oC compared to main stage decomposition of CP. It is due to the varying chemical composition of hemicellulose and cellulose. Since hemicellulose starts decomposing at much lower temperature than cellulose does, its higher percentage of former may shift DTG peak temperature to lower value. But for the second stage, both CP and BP show the same DTG peak temperature. After the main decomposition stage the residue remains is 32.3% and after the final stage it is 6.5%. BP shows constant mass after ~500^oC.

Figure 2: TG-DTA profile of BP Click here to View Figure

The species, DB is stable up to ~220^oC (Fig. 3). DB decomposes in three stages as indicated by the DTG peaks at 286, 409 and 452^oC and the corresponding exothermic DTA peaks at 312, 413 and 455^oC. The first and second DTA peaks are spaced by temperature difference of 101^oC for DB indicating that the char residue obtained at the end set of the first stage of decomposition resists oxidative gasification. But for CP and BP it was nearly 90^oC indicating that the residue formed is comparatively more susceptible to oxidation or decomposition to volatiles. The residue remained after the first and third stages are 33.3 and 4.3%, respectively. The sample of DB attains a constant mass after ~470 ^oC.

Figure 3:  TG-DTA profile of DB Click here to View Figure

The sample of DS exhibits no significant mass loss up to ~240^oC except small mass loss of 3.2% below 110^oC due to desorption of moisture (Fig. 4). The three stages of thermal decomposition are denoted by the DTG maxima at 323, 434 and 463 ^oC. The shoulder near ~300^oC at left hand side of the first DTG peak corresponds to the hemicellulose decomposition which commences at ~200 ^oC. This region corresponds to broad endothermic region in the DTA curve. The spacing between the first and second DTG maxima is about 111^oC indicating the thermal stability of the residue formed at the end set of the first stage. A high char yield of 39.7% is observed after the first stage. The second stage of decomposition is denoted by exothermic DTA peak at 434 ^oC. The final stage is indicated by a small exothermic DTA peak at 466^oC.

Figure 4: TG-DTA profile of DS Click here to View Figure

The sample of DH is stable up to ~220 ^oC with no significant mass loss (vide Fig. 5). The three decomposition stages are indicated by DTG peaks at 289, 414 and 456 ^oC and corresponding exothermic DTA maxima at 319, 418, and 459 ^oC. The major DTG peaks are separated by 125^oC showing the stability of the residue formed after the first stage. The residue left after the first stage is 40.9%.

Figure 5: TG-DTA profile of DH Click here to View Figure

Like DH, the bamboo species DG is also stable up to ~220 ^oC and decomposes thereafter (Fig. 6). Both DH and DG show constant mass after ~470^oC. The sample of DM undergoes decomposition in two stages indicated by DTG peaks at 323 and 436^oC, respectively (Fig. 7) with two sharp exothermic peaks at 333 and 446^oC. After the first decomposition stage the DTA profile shows a shoulder and is due to the decomposition of cellulose. The lignin undergoes endothermic fragmentation, but it is masked by strong exothermic process of char formation and oxidative reactions. The sample of BN (Fig. 8) also shows similar phenomenological data as that of BB (Fig. 9). The samples DS, DM, BN and BB show a shoulder near 300^oC and all the four samples shows the first DTG peak with maximum mass loss rate in the narrow range of 320-323^oC. The shoulder is due to the decomposition of hemicellulose as mentioned earlier. All other samples of bamboo without unique shoulder in DTG profile show DTG peak temperature ≤ 296^oC. The pyrolysis of biomass involves early decomposition of hemicellulose (commences ~200^oC), followed by pyrolysis of lignin and depolymerization of cellulose. The nature and amount of compounds formed during the decomposition of hemicellulose affects the decomposition mechanism of cellulose and lignin and trigger a set of simultaneous and consecutive reactions which pushes the peak to a higher temperature.

Figure 6: TG-DTA profile of DG Click here to View Figure

Figure 7: TG-DTA profile of DM Click here to View Figure

Figure 8: TG-DTA profile of BN Click here to View Figure

Figure 9: TG-DTA profile of BB Click here to View Figure

Apart from all other samples of bamboo, BV shows two well defined stages of decomposition as shown in Fig. 10. The sample of BV is stable up to ~220 ^oC. The first stage of decomposition is denoted by a large DTG peak at 276 ^oC. This sample gives the lowest DTG peak temperature among the ten bamboo species studied. The DTA peak temperature is observed at 306^oC. For the first stage, especially in the range from commencement of reaction to maximum rate of weight loss, oxidation is weakly exothermic, indicated by the difference between DTG peak (276 ^oC) and DTA maximum (306 ^oC). Towards the end of first stage, the reactions are found to be highly exothermic. After the first stage, the sample loses mass in a slow manner. The second stage is indicated by DTG peak at 441^oC and the process is exothermic which is evident from sharp DTA peak at 443 ^oC. This result is in tune with the observations made by Bada¹⁰. Bada proved that the bamboo variety (Bambusa multiplex) with the highest volatile matter has the lowest ignition temperature.

Figure 10: TG-DTA profile of BV Click here to View Figure

Kinetic Studies of Different Bamboo Species

Solid state thermal decomposition reactions are often quite complex. Keeping the particle size of sample very small for TG analysis ignores heat transfer and diffusion process. The purging of gas in analyzer dissipates the volatile components instantly. So thermal decomposition process is deemed to be an irreversible reaction and fits the first order parallel reaction model. Zehui Jiang and coworkers found that the Coats-Redfern method is useful in determining the kinetic parameters of Moso bamboo pyrolysis.¹¹ The kinetic parameters of the thermal degradation reactions of the ten bamboo samples were calculated by the Coats-Redfern integral method for each TG curve obtained at 10 Kmin^-1 in present investigation.¹² The kinetic parameters including order parameter, correlation coefficient, activation energy, pre-exponential factor and entropy of activation were evaluated for all the thermal decomposition stages.¹³ These values are tabulated and presented in table 2.

Table 2:  Kinetic parameters for the thermal decomposition of ten bamboo species 

Sample	Stage	Integral method/ Mechanism	Activation Energy, E (kJ mol-1)	Pre-exponential factor, A (s-1)	Entropy of activation DS (J K-1mol-1)	Corr. Coeff. r
Cephalostachyum pergracile	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.8	192.1	7.5×1015	53.6	0.9983
		Random nucleation	145.5	1.6×1011	35.9	0.9979
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.7	322.6	2.3×1023	195.4	0.9999
		Random nucleation	249.4	2.2×1017	80.2	0.9924
Bambusa pallida	I	Coats-Redfern; n=2.0	194.5	2.5×1016	64.0	0.9985
		Random nucleation	138.0	6.0×1010	43.6	0.9871
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.7	256.9	1.1×1018	-93.8	0.9993
		Random nucleation	206.2	7.3×1013	13.8	0.9962
Dendrocalamus brandisii	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.9	179.5	5.7×1014	32.4	0.9978
		Random nucleation	128.9	4.6×109	65.1	0.9878
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.6	282.6	4.9×1019	125.2	0.9994
		Random nucleation	233.6	5.0×1015	48.8	0.9961
Dendrocalamus strictus	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.0	153.0	3.0×1011	-30.4	0.9960
		Random nucleation	150.0	3.1×1011	-12.4	0.9960
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.0	311.8	1.5×1021	153.4	0.9978
		Random nucleation	301.8	1.7×1021	113.1	0.9978
Dendrocalamus hamiltoni	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.8	181.2	6.4×1014	33.3	0.9976
		Random nucleation	137.2	2.7×1010	50.5	0.9889
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.7	301.8	3.8×1021	161.4	0.9991
		Random nucleation	245.3	8.7×1016	72.4	0.9972
Dendrocalamus gigantus	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.6	172.9	1.2×1014	19.6	0.9989
		Random nucleation	144.7	1.9×1011	34.2	0.9953
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.5	241.9	1.0×1017	74.1	0.9989
		Random nucleation	203.7	6.6×1013	12.8	0.9969
Dendrocalamus membranaceus	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.4	176.3	5.7×1013	13.1	0.9968
		Random nucleation	153.8	4.1×1011	27.9	0.9949
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.6	295.1	1.0×1020	131.4	0.9965
		Random nucleation	233.6	1.7×1015	39.7	0.9886
Bambusa nutans	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.3	189.6	9.1×1014	35.7	0.9985
		Random nucleation	169.6	9.9×1012	11.8	0.9974
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.1	240.3	1.6×1016	57.9	0.9984
		Random nucleation	232.8	3.4×1015	45.2	0.9983
Bambusa bambos	I	Coats-Redfern; n=1.4	175.4	5.7×1013	12.6	0.9972
		Random nucleation	152.1	3.0×1011	30.9	0.9957
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.3	261.8	7.6×1017	90.3	0.9983
		Random nucleation	237.8	8.4×1015	52.9	0.9974
Bambusa vulgaris	I	Coats-Redfern; n=2.0	226.9	4.8×1019	126.8	0.9990
		Random nucleation	155.5	3.4×1012	10.2	0.9907
	II	Coats-Redfern; n=1.3	429.8	4.0×1029	314.5	0.9999
		Random nucleation	386.6	2.0×1026	251.3	0.9996

It has been already reported that pyrolysis of cellulose is endothermic while that of wood and lignin is endothermic initially but later becomes exothermic. The endothermic peaks are masked by strong exotherms due to an oxidative atmosphere, maintained in the experiment. Thus, trying to represent the full complexity of the hydrocarbon degradation process makes no sense and we depend upon global pyrolysis kinetics applied to bamboo is used to predict the overall rate of volatiles release (i.e., mass loss) from the solid. For all the samples two decomposition stages are evaluated since, the third stage, if exists, involve a mass loss of less than or equal to 5%. Thus determining kinetic parameters of the third stage is insignificant and process is simply the oxidation of residual char. So the present study concentrates on the first and second decomposition stages of all bamboo samples. For all the twenty decomposition stages of ten bamboo species, the order parameter ranges from 1.0 -2.0. Generally, the first stage of decomposition has higher order parameter compared to the second stage. The highest order parameter (2.0) is found for the first decomposition stage of BP and BV and the lowest for DS (1.0). The correlation coefficient for the first stage and second stage is greater than or equal to 0.9960 and 0.9965 respectively. The kinetic parameters show much higher values for the second stage in comparison with the first stage of decomposition. The activation energy for the primary decomposition stage ranges from 153.0 to 226.9 kJ mol^-1. The lowest and highest value for energy of activation is found for DS and BV respectively. It is interesting to note that the stability in terms of DTG peak temperature is highest for dendrocalamus strictus (DS), which possess the lowest values for kinetic parameters for the main decomposition stage. The order parameter for both decomposition stages are unity for DS. Entropy of activation for main stage of DS alone is negative and for all other samples it is positive. Positive values of entropy of activation indicates that the activated complexes are less ordered than the corresponding reactants. So, the mass loss reactions are faster than  in the normal course. For DS, activation energy for the second stage of decomposition (311.8 kJ mol^-1) is about two times higher than that obtained for the first stage (153.0 kJ mol^-1). This indicates that with comparatively higher energy of activation, DS undergo very fast decomposition with high volatile evolution towards the end of decomposition, once activated. Also, the higher the activation energy, the higher is the sensitivity of Arrhenius parameter to temperature.

The kinetic parameters for the main stage of thermal decomposition are found to be highest for the species, Bambusa vulgaris (BV). The activation energy for the major mass loss stage for the bamboo samples are much lower than the activation energy of pure cellulose (table 3.2). The activation energy for major mass loss stage of different bamboo species decreases in the order BV > BP > CP > BN > DH > DB > DM > BB > DG > DS. The average activation energy of bamboo samples for the first stage of decomposition, excluding BV and DS, are 183±11 kJ mol^-1. BV and DS show large deviation. The order parameter for the second stage of decomposition ranges from 1.0 to 1.7. For the second stage, values of the kinetic parameters are found to be maximum for the species Bambusa vulgaris and the lowest values are obtained for Bambusa nutans. For the second stage of decomposition, entropy of activation is positive for all samples. The average activation energy for the second stage is ~ 294 kJ mol^-1.

Mechanism of Decomposition

Mechanism based kinetic equations elucidated by Satava have been employed to determine the mechanism of the decomposition for ten bamboo varieties and FR treated DS samples.¹⁴ The best linear plots obtained for each of the decomposition stages is chosen as the one, corresponding to the correct mechanism of the reaction for a particular decomposition stage. From the values of slope and intercept of the linear plots, the kinetic parameters were calculated and tabulated in table 2. It is found that the decomposition reactions of all these systems go along with the Mampel equation involving random nucleation with single nucleus on each particle.¹⁴ The kinetic parameters evaluated using these equations are mostly comparable with those utilizing the Coats-Redfern equation. Best fit model for the kinetics of bamboo pyrolysis is still in question as the process of degradation involve catalysis by metal compounds present in the bamboo matrix and the various secondary reactions owing to different physical and chemical characteristics of components such as cellulose, xylan and lignin.¹⁵

Conclusion

The thermal stability of ten varieties of bamboo of approximately same age and cultivated in the same land terrain were compared using simultaneous TG-DTA analysis. The thermochemical conversion reactions are found to be very useful techniques for biomass upgrading. The pyrolysis of lignocellulosic materials primarily involve a polymeric structure breakdown, converting the components into volatiles and char. Based on the thermal stability of species it can be best utilized for commercial purpose.

Thermal stability in terms of first stage of degradation is lowest for BV and higher stability is attributed to DS and DM. The onset temperature for active lignocellulosic pyrolysis for the first mass loss stage is between 220 ^oC – 240 ^oC.  DM, BN and BV complete the decomposition process in two distinct stages and all others in three stages. The first stage, dominant below 340˚C, decomposes polymers forming active carbonaceous char which release volatile gases upon increase in temperature leaving approximately 5% by weight of above 450 ˚C.

The kinetic parameters were calculated for the mass loss stages during slow decomposition of ten species of bamboo by the Coats-Redfern integral method. The kinetic parameters viz., energy of activation, pre-exponential factor and entropy of activation for the main stage of pyrolysis are found to be highest for BV.  The activation energy for major mass loss stage of different bamboo species decreases in the order BV > BP > CP > BN > DH > DB > DM > BB > DG > DS.

The first stage of decomposition has higher order parameter compared to the second stage. For all the twenty decomposition stages of ten bamboo species, the order parameter ranges from 1.0-2.0. The highest order parameter is found for the first decomposition stage of BP and BV and the lowest for DS.  Entropy of activation for main stage of DS alone is negative and for all others it is positive. For the second stage of pyrolysis, entropy of activation is positive for all samples. This indicates that the activated complexes are less ordered than the reactants, and evidently the decomposition reactions are presumed faster.

The decomposition reactions of all these samples obeys the Mampel equation indicating the mechanism of random nucleation with one nucleus on each particle.  The kinetic parameters calculated using the equations on the above-proposed mechanism for the samples are mostly comparable with those calculated using the Coats-Redferm equation.

Global pyrolysis kinetics applied to bamboo can be extended for predicting the overall volatile release rate from the solid and consequently the thermal stability and also shower light upon the mechanistic steps in the thermal degradation process.

Acknowledgement

The author gratefully acknowledge with thanks JNTBGRI, Thiruvananthapuram, India for providing the bamboo samples voluntarily and Department of chemistry, University of Kerala for granting access to thermogravimetric facility.

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Rowell R. M. Wood Mat. Sci. Engg., 2006, 1, 29-33.
   CrossRef
2. Scurlock J.M.O.; Dayton D.C.; Hames B. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2000, 19,229-244.
   CrossRef
3. Antal M.J., Biomass Pyrolysis: A Review of the Literature Part 2 – Lignocellulose Pyrolysis. in: K.W. Böer, J.A. Duffie (Eds) Advances in Solar Energy. Springer, Boston, 1985, 175-255.
   CrossRef
4. Shafizadeh F., The Chemistry of Pyrolysis and Combustion, in: R. Rowell (Ed), The Chemistry of Solid Wood, American Chemical Society, U.S., 1984, 489-529.
   CrossRef
5. Kawamoto H.; Murayama M.; Saka S. J. Wood. Sci., 2003, 49, 469–473.
   CrossRef
6. Rowell R.M.; Dietenberger M. A. Thermal Properties, Combustion and Fire Retardancy of wood. in: R. M. Rowell (Ed) Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013, 127-150.
7. Wiedemann H. G. Thermochim. Acta, 1993, 229, 215-228.
   CrossRef
8. Amutio M.; Lopez G.; Aguado R.; Artetxe M.; Bilbao J.; Olazar M. Fuel, 2012, 95, 305-311.
   CrossRef
9. Lu J. J.; Chen W. Appl. Energy, 2015, 160, 49-57.
   CrossRef
10. Bada S.O.; Falcon R.M.S.; Falcon L.M. Thermochim. Acta, 2014, 589207-214.
    CrossRef
11. Zehui Jiang; Zhijia Liu; Benhua Fei;Zhiyong Cai; Yan Yu; Xing’e Liu. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 2012, 94, 48-52.
12. Coats A., Redfern J. Nature, 1964, 201, 68–69.
    CrossRef
13. Urbanovici E.; Popescu C.; Segal E. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 1999, 58, 683–700.
    CrossRef
14. Satava V.; Skvara F. J. Am. Cer. Soc. 1969, 52,591–595.
    CrossRef
15. Mui E. L. K.; Cheung W. H.; Lee V. K. C.; McKay G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 5710-5722.
    CrossRef

---

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.