ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Fractional Analysis of Ascorbic Acid and Dopamine at Copper Nanoparticles Electrodeposited onto Gold Electrode

Volume 33, Number 4

Mohamed I. Awad1,3, Mohammed A. Kassem1,2, Ahmed M. Hameed1, B.A.Al Jahdali1 and Omar A. Hazazi1

1Chemistry Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah Al-Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia Kingdom.

2Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha13518, Egypt.

3Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Corresponding author E-mail: mawad70@yahoo.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/330421

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

The electrochemical behavior of ascorbic acid (AA) and dopamine (DA) at copper nanoparticles modified polycrystalline gold electrode (nano-Cu/Au) has been studied using cyclic voltammetry. The modified nano-Cu/Au electrodes have been assembled using cyclic voltammetric techniques. Nano-Cu/Au have been successfully differentiated the electrochemical response of the two species, in contrary to the bare polycrystalline gold electrode at which electrochemical response of the two species were overlapped, and only one anodic peak for the two species is obtained. At the optimized conditions, both species have been simultaneously determined using square wave voltammetry. Acceptable rectilinear ranges for both species have been obtained with correlation coefficients of 0.998 and 0.995 for DA and AA, respectively. The limits of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ) were calculated and found to be 1.816 and 6.05 for DA and 34.57 and 115.25 for AA. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for both DA and AA were deliberated to be 2.04 and 0.376 %, respectively.

KEYWORDS:

Dopamine, Ascorbic acid, Voltammetry, Modified Gold Electrode, Electroanalysis

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Awad M. I, Kassem M. A, Hameed A. M, Al-Jahdali B. A, Hazazi O. A. Fractional Analysis of Ascorbic Acid and Dopamine at Copper Nanoparticles Electrodeposited onto Gold Electrode. Orient J Chem 2017;33(4).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Awad M. I, Kassem M. A, Hameed A. M, Al-Jahdali B. A, Hazazi O. A. Fractional Analysis of Ascorbic Acid and Dopamine at Copper Nanoparticles Electrodeposited onto Gold Electrode. Orient J Chem 2017;33(4). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=35785

Introduction

Metal nanoparticles with their unique electrocatalytic properties, compared with their metal counterparts, have been applied in a wide spectrum of applications1-9. They have size dependent unique optical, electrical and chemical properties and are very hopeful for everyday applications in various research areas, like molecular catalysts, multifunctional reagent and biosensors. In many cases, the sluggish electrochemical behavior of several compounds was enhanced via the tailored nanoparticles modified electrodes, and also for the solution of the fouling of some bulk materials5,9. For example, the electrochemical behavior of dopamine (DA) at polycrystalline gold electrode is unstable, and after few cycles at poly-Au electrodes, the electrode is fouled and the electro-oxidation of the dopamine is largely retarded. Fouling has been reported to be due to the adsorption of the oxidation product. In addition dopamine analysis can’t be realized at the bare poly-gold electrode in the presence of the coexisting ascorbic acid as their electrochemical response can’t be differentiated10.

Separation of the oxidation potentials of the two peaks have been realized at gold modified electrodes, whether modified by organic or inorganic modifier. Several papers have been published regarding the analysis of DA and AA in their coexistence at thiol self-assembled monolayer onto gold electrodes11,12. The separation of the two peaks relies on the differential interaction of the two species, i.e., DA and AA with the modified electrodes. The electrochemical behavior of one species was enhanced while the other one was either retarded or unaffected11,12.  However, those electrodes suffer the desorption of the modifier, and consequently loose its electrocatalytic activity, especially when subjected to higher anodic potentials. Gold electrodes modified with inorganic species have presented more stable behavior with high electrocatalytic activity, especially when modified in the nanoscale size13-18.

Several methods for determination of DA are available in literature. It includes, but not limited to spectrophotometry, capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography19-23. However, these methods suffer several drawbacks that can be solved by electrochemical methods known by simple setting. In the present work DA and AA analysis in their coexistence at copper nanoparticles modified gold electrodes will be studied. This combination is selected as gold electrode is well known to reveal the two peaks for the oxidation of the two species at an acceptable potential range, and copper is expected to solve the problem of fouling via giving an alternative site for the adsorption of the oxidation products. The experimental conditions for a selective and sensitive analysis are optimized.

Experimental

Chemicals

Analytical grade chemicals were used in all experiments which prepared using bidistilled water. Standard solutions of ascorbic acid and dopamine, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, with molecular formulas shown in Fig. 1were freshly prepared by dissolving claculated amounts of them in bidistilled water. The phosphate buffer solutions of different pHs were prepared according to Gorimi24 and then adjusted using a pH-meter.

 Figure 1: The structure of (a) Dopamine and (b) Ascorbic acid

Figure 1: The structure of (a) Dopamine and (b) Ascorbic acid


Click here to View figure

Electrodes

The polycrystalline gold electrode (poly-Au) (0.16 cm in diameter) has been prepared as previously reported [2, 4]. Shortly, it is  polished to a mirror-like with alumina powder and  emery paper (down to 0.06 mm), and then rinsed using ultrasonic waves in bidistilled water. Next, it is electrochemically pretreated in nitrogen-saturated 0.05 M sulfuric acidsolution by repeating the potential scan in the potential ranges (– 0.2 -1.5 V) vs. Ag/AgCl (KCl sat.) until the cyclic voltammogram finger print  of a clean gold electrode was attained.

Elaboration of the modified electrode Nano-Cu/Au

Cupper nanoparticles (nano-Cu) modified Au electrode (nano-Cu/Au) was prepared by the deposition of nano-Cu electrochemically onto the pretreated poly gold electrode  using 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution of pH 7 containing 1.0 mM CuSO4 by conducting one or more potential cycle at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1 between 0.7 and – 0.2 V  vs. Ag/AgCl (KCl sat.).

Measurement

The electrochemical measurements were carried out using a PGSTAT30 (Netherlands) galvanostat/potentiostat controlled by software of (FRA) and (GPES). An Ag/AgCl (KCl sat.) electrode was used as the reference electrode. The counter electrode (a platinum spiral wire) and the working electrode were separated by a porous glass. A conventional three-electrode glass cell of about 40 mL capacity was used for all measurements. All electrochemical measurements were conducted under nitrogen saturated solutions.

Results and Discussion

Voltammetric Characterization

The morphological and voltammetric behavior of the copper nanoparticles modified polycrystalline Au electrode (nano-Cu/Au) has been previously reported4. The voltammetric behavior of nano-Cu/Au has been marked by conducting  cyclic voltammetry in N2-saturated  0.5 M sulfuric acid, and the deposition of nano copper has been revealed from the decrease in the peak correspond to the construction of gold oxides monolayer and its couple corresponding to the reduction peak2.  The surface areas of both electrodes were estimated from the charge consumed in the reduction peak of the gold oxide monolayer, not from the reduction peak, to avoid the overestimation in the case of using oxidation peak as a result of the overlapping of this peak with the oxygen evolution.   The surface coverage, q, of the deposited Cu nanoparticles, was also calculated from the following equation25;

Θ = 1-Q1/Q2                                      (1)

where Q1 is the amount of charge spent in the gold oxide reduction peaks obtained at the nano-Cu/Au electrode and and Q2 the amount of charge consumed in the gold oxide reduction peaks obtained at bare Au electrode. It has been found that, surface coverage, q = 0.22 pointing to the incomplete covering of the underlying gold substrate by nano-Cu, consistently with the reported AFM image4.

Fig. 2 represents CVs  obtained at bare polycrystalline gold (a), and nano-Cu/Au (b)  electrodes in N2-saturated  phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.0 containing 1.0 mM AA + 0.5 mM DA. At bare polycrystalline Au electrode (curve a) one anodic peak  corresponding to the electrochemical responses of DA and AA over a wide potential range (ca. 0-0.5 V). This anodic peak is coupled by one cathodic peak centered at 0.16 V, probably corresponds to the dopamine reduction as ascorbic acid is totally irreversible11,12. Thus unmodified gold electrode can not be utilized for the selective analysis of the two species in their coexistence.  In curve (b ) which is obtained at nano-Cu electrode, interestingly the two peaks for the oxidation of AA and DA are nicely separated with enough potential difference which could facilitate their selective analysis in their coexistence.

Next, the effect of loading of copper was examined aiming at increasing selectivity and senstivity, nano-Cu loading was contrlled by varying the  number of potential cycles and results are shown in Fig. 3 in which the cyclic voltammograms  obtained at bare Au (a) and nano-Cu/Au  (b, c and d) electrodes in phosphate buffer solution containing 0.5 mM DA + 0.75 mM AA are given. Nano-Cu/Au were prepared as mentioned in the experimental section by (b) one potential cycle, (c) two cycles and (d) 5 potential cycles. As clearly shown, the loading level of Cu is inherently controlling; while nano-Cu/Au electrode prepared by two potential cycles nicely separate enough the two oxidation peaks of DA and AA for furher analysis of the two species in their coexistence, the one prepared by one potential cycle didnot separate the two oxidation peaks, and rather one broad peak is obtained. The one prepared by 5 potential cycles (curve d) though it could separate the two peaks, but the separation is not as much as the one obtained in the case of the modified electrode prepared by 2 potential cycles. Moreover, the current is this case is smaller comparatively. Hence, the loading prepared by two potential cycles will be used hereafter as the optimum one.

Figure 2: CVs obtained at (a) Au and (b) nano-Cu/Au electrodes in in N2-saturated 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7 containing 500 µM DA and 1 mM AA

Figure 2: CVs obtained at (a) Au and (b) nano-Cu/Au electrodes in in N2–saturated 0.1 M    phosphate buffer pH 7 containing 500 µM DA and 1 mM AA



Click here to View figure
Figure 3: CVs obtained at (a) Au and (b, c, d) nano-Cu/Au electrodes in in N2-saturated 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7 containing 500 µM DA and 750 µM AA, (b) one, (c) two and (d) five potential cycles

Figure 3: CVs obtained at (a) Au and (b, c, d) nano-Cu/Au electrodes in in N2–saturated 0.1 M    phosphate buffer pH 7 containing 500 µM DA and 750 µM AA, (b) one, (c) two and (d) five potential cycles


Click here to View figure

Next the pH effect is optimized, the oxidation of DA (Eq. 2) and AA (Eq. 3) involves protons and thus it is expected to be pH dependent. CVs of DA and AA obtained at nano-Cu/Au electrode at a scan rate of 100 mV s-1 in phosphate buffer solutions of dissimilar pHs are shown in Fig. 4. As clearly shown, as expected,  the peak potentials of the two species shifted negatively upon increasing the pH. In addition the peak current slightly increased. The large peak separation is obtained at pH 4.5 (curve a). Larger than this pH the two peaks for the DA and AA oxidation overlap. Thus the pH of 4.5 will be used hereafter as the optimum one along with the loading obtained by two potential cycles.  Peaks potential extracted from this figure are plotted against pH, and a linear plot with a slope equals 60 mV/pH was obtained (data are not shown). The linear dependence of peak potential of DA on pH indicates the presence of a proton-transfer reaction preceding the electrode process. The slope is nearby to that for a Nernstian reaction, revealing that the uptake of 2 electrons is accompanied by an equal number of protons (Eq. 1). Similar results are obtained for the dependence of the oxidation of AA on electrolyte pH.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1


Click here to View scheme
Figure 4: Effect of pH on CVs modified nano Cu/Au electrode in phosphate buffer containing 500 µM DA and 750 µM AA at a scan rate of 100 mV sec-1, pH (4.5 – 8.5) Figure 4: Effect of pH on CVs modified nano Cu/Au electrode in phosphate buffer containing 500 µM DA and 750 µM AA at a scan rate of 100 mV sec-1, pH (4.5 – 8.5)

Click here to View figure

The selectivity of the electroanalysis  for DA and AA presented here, as a main criteria for the analysis of the two species in their coexistence was investigated, by measuring the CVs at the nano-Cu/Au working electrode for 0.25 mM DA in the presence of different amounts  of ascorbic acid (Fig 5). DA oxidation peak current  keeps constant when the concentration of DA was kept constant while changing the concentration of AA. Also same behavior with keeping the concentration of AA and changing the concentration of DD; the former oxidation peak keeps constant while the latter changes. At nano-Cu/Au electrode, AA oxidation peak  is negatively shifted compared with its oxidation at bare electrode. This enables the  selective analysis of DA in the presence of AA.

Figure 5: CVs obtained at modified nano-Cu/Au electrode in in N2-saturated 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 4.5 containing 250 µM DA (a), 250 µM DA - 250 µM AA (b), 250 µM DA - 500 µM AA (c), 500 µM DA - 500 µM AA (d) and 500 µM DA - 750 µM AA (d)

Figure 5: CVs obtained at modified nano-Cu/Au electrode in in N2–saturated 0.1 M    phosphate buffer pH 4.5 containing 250 µM DA (a), 250 µM DA – 250 µM AA (b), 250 µM DA – 500 µM AA (c), 500 µM DA – 500 µM AA (d) and 500 µM DA – 750 µM AA (d)



Click here to View figure

Square Wave Voltammetry

The two well-separated square wave voltammograms peaks for AA and DAoxidationare utilized for their selective determnation. Square wave voltammetry (SWV) offers excellent discrimination against double-layer charging current and accordingly has a high sensitivity26,27 compared with cyclic voltammetry. First the interrelated  instrumental parameters, i.e., step potential, square wave amplitude and frequency, were optimized before recording the square wave voltammograms for the oxidation of DA and AA.  Finally the following parameters were  used: step potential, 4 mV, square wave amplitude, 25 mV, and frequency 25 Hz (and thus the scan rate is 100 mV s-1).

The SWVs of AA and DA in their coexistence were recorded at nano-Cu/Au electrode at the optimum conditions of pH and instrumental parameters and results are shown in Fig. 6 in which well-separtated SWVspeaks are obtained for the oxidation of successive addition of AA and DA.   The oxidation peaks of DA and AA are noticeably detected at about 0.38 and 0.22 V, respectively. Based on the SWVs obtained, the linear calibration curves for DA and AA were obtained in N2-saturated phosphate buffer solution of pH 4.5 over a wide concentration range and shown as Fig. 7.  The relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated and found to be 2.04 and 0.376 % for DA and AA, respectively, representing a perfect precision of the studied routine.

Figure 6: Square wave voltammograms obtained at modified Cu/Au electrode for simultaneous determination of DA and AA in phosphate buffer (pH 4.5)

Figure 6: Square wave voltammograms obtained at modified Cu/Au electrode for simultaneous determination of DA and AA in phosphate buffer (pH 4.5)



Click here to View figure

The limit (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of detection are estimated based on Eqs. 4 and 5, respectively28:

Vol33No4_Fra_Moh_f4.5

where s is the standard deviation of the response (s) and m is the slope of the calibration curve. The LOD and LOQ for the present electroanalysis of DA were calculated as 1.816 and 6.05 mM, respectively and for AA as 34.575 and 115.25 mM, respectively. Analytical parameters for simultaneous determination of DA and AA at the nano-Cu/Au electrode are summarized in Table 1. Relative standard deviation is of smaller value pointing to the high reproducibility of the present method. In addition statistical data obtained using F-test shows the high significance of the results obtained by the present method29.

Table 1: Methodical parameters of the electroanalytical determination of DA and AA using nano-Cu/Au electrode at the optimum conditions

Parameter

DA

AA
Optimum pH 4.5 4.5
Measured potential, mV 380 220
Scan rate, mV sec-1 100 100
Linear concentration range, µM 12.5-100 125-1000
Regression equation
slope 0.074 0.004
Intercept 0.757 0.579
Correlation coefficient, R2 0.998 0.995
Standard deviation, SD (n=6) 1.02 1.88
Relative Standard deviationa, RSD, % 2.04 0.376
LOD 1.816 34.575
LOQ 6.05 115.25
SD of intercept, x 10-4 7.82 2.10
F– testb 2.02 1.68

a Relative standard deviation for six replicates

bTheoretical value for F-test at 95% confidence limit is 5.05.

Figure 7: Calibration curves for both (a) ascorbic acid and (b) dopamine extracted from square wave voltammetry (SWs) using phosphate buffer solution of pH 4.5

Figure 7: Calibration curves for both (a) ascorbic acid and (b) dopamine extracted from square wave voltammetry (SWs) using phosphate buffer solution of pH 4.5


Click here to View figure

Conclusions

Dopamine (DA) and ascorbic acid (AA) voltammetric behaviors  has been studied at nano-Cu modified polycrystalline (poly-Au) electrode. DA and AA  has been selectively and simultaneously analyzed at nano-Cu modified polycrystalline gold electrode (nano-Cu/Au) in phosphate buffer solution (pH 4.5). The  loading level of Cu  as well as the oxidation of the deposited nano-Cu have played a prominent role in the simultaneous determination of the two species.  The calibration curves for both species have been obtained over an acceptable concentration range with a high correlation coefficient

Acknowlegment

The authors would like to thank Institute of Scientific Research and Revival of Islamic Heritage at Umm Al-Qura University (Project ID 43405072) for the financial support.

References

  1. Etesami, M; Norita, M; Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2011, 6, 4676-4689.
  2. Awad, M.I; El-Deab, M.S; Ohsaka, T. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154, 810-816
    CrossRef
  3. Danial, A.S; Awad, M.I; Al-Odail, F.A; Saleh, M.M. J Mol Liqu. 2017, 227,  919-925.
    CrossRef
  4. Kassem, M.A; Hazazi, O.A; Ohsaka, T; Awad , M.I. Electroanalysis, 2016, 27, 539–545.
    CrossRef
  5. Awad, M.I; Saleh, M.M; Ohsaka T. J Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19, 1331-1340.
    CrossRef
  6. El-Refaei, S.M; Saleh, M.M; Awad, M.I. J Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 5–12
    CrossRef
  7. El-Refaei, S.M; Saleh, M.M; Awad, M.I. J. Power Sources 2013, 223, 125-128.
    CrossRef
  8. El-Refaei, S.M; Awad, M.I; El-Anadouli, B.E; Saleh, M.M. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 92, 460-467.
    CrossRef
  9. Awad, M.I; Ohsaka, T. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 306-312.
    CrossRef
  10. Capella, P; Ghasemzadeh, B; Mitchell, K; Adams, R.N. Electroanalysis, 1990, 2, 175-182.
    CrossRef
  11. Raj, C.R; Oshaka, T. Electrochem. Commun., 2001, 11, 633-638.
  12. Raj, C. R; Ohsaka, T. Bioelectrochem., 2001, 53, 251-256.
    CrossRef
  13. Liu, L; Du, J; Li, S; Yuan, B; Han, H; Jing,  M; Xia, N. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 730-735.
    CrossRef
  14. Kaya, M; Volkan, M. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7729-7735.
    CrossRef
  15. Weng, S.H; Zheng, Y.J; Zhao, C.F; Zhou, J.Z; Lin, L.Q; Zheng, Z.F; Lin,  X.H. Microchim. Acta. 2013, 180, 371-378.
    CrossRef
  16. Li, Y; Huang, F; Chen, J; Mo, T; Li, S; Wang, F; Feng, S; Li, Y. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 6332-6342.
  17.  Yu, H.Y; Xu, M.Q; Yu, S.H; Zhao, G.C. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8 , 8050-8057.
  18. Wang, H.B; Zhang, H.D; Chen, Y; Huang, K.J; Liu, Sens. Y.M. Actuators B: Chem. 2015, 220, 146-154.
    CrossRef
  19. Zhao, Y.S; Zhao, S.L; Huang, J.M; Ye, F.G. Talanta 2011, 85, 2650-2654.
    CrossRef
  20. Jacobus, F.S; Raluca, S.S. Talanta 2012, 102, 34-43.
    CrossRef
  21. Attilio, N; Emanuela, G; Giovanni, S; Antonio, T. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 810, 17-24.
    CrossRef
  22. Gottas, A; Ripel, A; Boix, F; Vindenes, V; Mørland; J; Øiestad, E.L. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Meth. 2015, 74, 75-79.
  23. Ferry, B; Gifu, E.P; Sandu, I; Denoroy, L; Parrot, S. J. Chromatogr. 2014, 951, 52-57.
  24. Gomori, G.  “Methods in Enzymology”, 1955, 1,141.
    CrossRef
  25. Trasatti, S; Petrii, O.A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 711–734.
    CrossRef
  26. O’Dea, J.J; Osteryoung, J; Osteryoung, R.A. Anal. Chem., 1981, 53, 695–701.
    CrossRef
  27. Validation of Analytical Procedures, Methodology, International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), 1994,6.
  28. Murray, R.W. In Electroanalytical Chemistry, ediyed by A J Bard & Stratmann, (Marcel Dekker, New York) 1984,13,191.
  29. Qu, W; Wu, K; Hu, S; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 36, 631-635.
    CrossRef

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.