ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Synthesis, structural visualization, spectroscopic, and thermal studies of charge transfer Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) bromides-carbamide complexes at elevated temperature

Khlood Abou-Melha1*, Moamen S. Refat2,3, and Khaled M. Elsabawy2,4

1Chemistry Department, Q1 Faculty of Science of Girls, Abha, King Khalid University, Abha,

2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taif University, 888 Taif, Kingdom Saudi Arabia

3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Port Said, Port Said University, Egypt

4Materials Science Unit, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, 31725, Tanta-Egypt.

Corresponding Author Email: kaboumelha@yahoo.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/310336

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Published : 09 Sep 2015
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

In the present study, the composition and structure of Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) compounds resulted from the chemical reactions of copper(II), nickel(II) and zinc(II) bromide salts with carbamide  in aqueous media at 95 oC have been investigated, using IR, electron spin resonance ESR and x-ray powder diffraction spectroscopy as well as thermal analysis TG/DTG/DSC. The Cu2(OH)3Br, [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2], and ZnCO3.xH2O compounds were achieved by a novel synthetic route through with a low cost precursor like carbamide. The infrared spectra of the results indicate absence of the individual bands of carbamide, but exhibited of the distinguished bands of hydroxyl, isocyanate, NCO, and ionic carbonate, CO32– for Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) compounds, respectively. Visualized investigations were performed to confirm crystal structure, validity and stability of the product compounds. A general reaction mechanisms describing the preparation of Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) compounds were discussed.

KEYWORDS:

carbonate CO32–; Isocyanate ion; Infrared spectra; X-ray; carbamide

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Abou-Melha K, Refat M. S, Elsabawy K. M. Synthesis, structural visualization, spectroscopic, and thermal studies of charge transfer Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) bromides-carbamide complexes at elevated temperature. Orient J Chem 2015;31(3).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Abou-Melha K, Refat M. S, Elsabawy K. M. Synthesis, structural visualization, spectroscopic, and thermal studies of charge transfer Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) bromides-carbamide complexes at elevated temperature. Orient J Chem 2015;31(3). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=10708


Introduction

Carbamide is physiologically very important. It is the chief nitrogenous product of protein metabolism. Carbamide has a melting point of 132 °C, soluble in water and ethanol, but insoluble in ether. Carbamide is used for preparing formaldehyde-Carbamide resin (plastics) [1], barbiturates [2], and fertilizers [3-6]. Carbamide is also extensively used in the paper industry to soften cellulose and has been used to promote healing in infected wounds and many other applications in the field of medicine [7-9]. Some metal-carbamide complexes have pharmaceutical application, e.g., the platinum-carbamide complex which is used as antitumor [10].

Yamaguchi and Stewart [11, 12] were assigned all of the observed frequencies in the spectra of carbamide and carbamide-d4. The two vibrations of the frequencies at 1686 and 1603cm-1 were assigned as the 1686 cm-1 band due to CO stretching vibration and the 1603 cm-1 band for NH2 bending motion. The calculations studied by Yamaguchi showed that for the band at 1686 cm-1, the contribution of the NH2 bending motion is greater than that of CO stretching motion. The infrared bands of carbamide-d4 observed at 1245 and 1154 cm-1 are assigned to ND2 bending vibrations. This assignment is consistent with the observed depolarization degrees of the Raman lines. The 1464cm-1 frequency of carbamide is assigned to the CN stretching vibration. The corresponding frequency of carbamide-d4 is observed at 1490cm-1. The 1150cm-1 band is assigned to NH2 rocking vibrations.

The reactions between transition metal ions and carbamide at room temperature have been studied extensively [13-17]. The infrared spectra of these complexes clearly indicated that carbamide molecule behaves as a mono dentate ligand and coordinates to the metal ions through the oxygen atom and not the nitrogen atom.

The nature of the reaction products depend strongly on the type of metal ions and so the metal salt used. The novelty in our previously studies [18-27] were oriented to the reaction of carbamide  ligand with different metals such as Co(II), pb(II), Sn(II), Cr(III), Fe(III), Au(III), Sn(IV), V(V) and Mo(IV) at high temperature which demonstrate that the types of metal ions beside their anions have a pronounced effect on the nature of the reaction products. The published papers were trended for the reaction of carbamide  with different metal salts at elevated temperature lead to discovering a novel method for preparation pbCO3 and CoCO3 [21], lanthanide carbonates [23,27], limonite, FeO(OH) [20], 2ZnCO3.3Zn(OH)2 [19], SnOCl2.2H2O [18], (Cr2O3, MnO2, MoO3 and WO3) oxides resulted from a novel oxidation reduction reaction between (K2CrO4 or K2Cr2O7), KMnO4, Na2MoO4 and Na2WO4, respectively, with carbamide  in an aqueous solution at ~ 85 oC [27].

The sunshine side in this study was undertaken to identify the nature of the reaction mechanisms of the products resulted during the reaction of carbamide with CuBr2,NiBr2 or ZnBr2 at 95 oC for 16 hrs in aqueous media. The reaction products were isolated as solids and characterized well by X-ray diffraction reinforced and supported with visualization studies as well as spectroscopic and thermal analyses tools.

Experimental

Materials and synthesis

All chemicals used throughout this work were analytical pure. The Cu2(OH)3Br, [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2], and ZnCO3.xH2O compounds were prepared by mixing an aqueous solutions (100 ml) of 0.1 M of carbamide  with 0.01 M of the respective CuBr2,NiBr2 or ZnBr2 salts. The mixtures were heated at 95 oC for 16 hrs in a hot plate. The solid products compounds were filtered off, washed several times with hot water, dried at 80 oC in an oven for 3 hours and then placed in vacuo over anhydrous calcium chloride. The yields of the obtained Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) compounds were varied in the range 63-to-77% depending upon the type of metal as well as on the counter ions associated with the metal ion. The elemental analyses for Cu2(OH)3Br, [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2], and ZnCO3.xH2O compounds (Table 1) obtained during the reaction of carbamide with the respective metal bromide salts almost the same and indicate the absence of nitrogen element.

Instruments

The elemental analyses of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen contents were performed by the microanalysis unit at Cairo University, Egypt, using a Perkin Elmer CHN 2400 (USA). The infrared spectra with KBr discs were recorded on a Shimadzu FT-IR Spectrophotometer (4000–400 cm-1) in Taif University. The electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum for copper(II) compound was performed on Jeol, JES-FE2XG, ESR-spectrometer, Frequency 9.44 GHz with Jeol Microwave unit. The thermal studies TG/DTG/DSC were carried out on a SCINCO DSC 1500 STA in Taif University, which was calibrated with indium metal. The X-ray diffraction patterns for the selected charge-transfer complexes were recorded on X ‘Pert PRO PANanalytical X-ray powder diffraction, target copper with secondary monochromate. Carbonate content in the zinc(II) compound was determined by dissolving a sample of each product in excess standard HCl and the excess of HCl was determined using standard sodium carbonate [28]. The percentage of Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) within their compounds were determined gravimetrically method till constant weight and stable formula.

Results and Discussion

Infrared Spectra

The reaction of aqueous solutions of carbamide with bromide salts of copper(II), nickel(II), and zinc(II) at 95 oC produces a green, light green, and white solid crystalline products, respectively. The infrared spectra of carbamide as well as the reaction products of different Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) salts with carbamide at elevated temperature were obtained from potassium bromide discs. The spectra of free carbamide ligand, copper(II), nickel(II), and zinc(II) compounds are shown in Fig. 1a-d, respectively. The infrared spectra show no bands due to any of the reactants and of coordinated carbamide.

In case of zinc carbonate hydrated compound, a group of bands characteristic for the ionic carbonate, (CO3)2-, is appeared [29]. Based on this fact, along with that obtained from elemental analysis data as well as the volumetric determination of (CO3)2- group with standard solution of HCl and beside that the infrared spectrum of the commercially obtained ZnCO3 is the same as that of the product resulted from the reaction between zinc(II) bromide and carbamide at 95 oC. The infrared assignments agree quite well with those known [29] for the ionic carbonate (CO3)2-. The (CO3)2- ion is planar and therefore, it belongs to the D3h symmetry. It is expected to display four modes of vibrations, A`1 + A“2 + 2E` (E` is a doubly degenerate motion). The vibration A`1 is only Raman active while the other n2, n3 and n4 are infrared active. The stretching vibrations of the type; n(C-O); n3(E`) is observed as a medium band in the range of ˜ 1500-1370 cm-1 while the stretching vibration n(C-O); n1(A`1) is observed in the region ~1050 cm-1 as a medium-to-weak band. It should be indicated here that this motion (A`1) should be infrared inactive, its weak appearance in the spectrum of MCO3 could be related to weak solid-solid interactions causes the symmetry of CO32- to be lowered than D3h. The out of plane of vibration d(OCO); n2(A“2) is observed in the range of ~830 cm-1 as a medium strong band while, the angle deformation bending vibration d(OCO); n4(E`) appear in the range of 690 cm-1 as a medium strong. The infrared spectra of zinc(II) carbonate hydrate, ZnCO3.xH2O (Fig. 1d) show that, some these products are hygroscopic and its clearly have moisture water. The band related to the stretching vibration nas(O-H) and ns(O-H) of H2O are observed as expected at 3441 and 3353 cm-1, respectively. At room temperature the coordination compounds of Zinc(II) ion with urea have been studied extensively [30,31] and it was found that, in these complexes, urea coordinated through its oxygen atom forming the [Zn(urea)2X2] where (X = Cl, NO3 or CH3COO). At high temperature the role of Zn(II) ions in decomposing the coordination urea in the form of [Zn(urea)2X2] could be understood as follows;

formula1

 

 Fig. 1: Infrared spectra of a- Urea, b- Cu2(OH)3Br, c- [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] and  d- ZnCO3.H2O compounds Figure 1: Infrared spectra of a- Urea, b- Cu2(OH)3Br, c- [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] and d- ZnCO3.H2O compounds Click here to View figure

 

Metallic hydroxy salts with the composition M2(OH)3X (M = Cu, Co; X = organic anion) [32-34] have been extensively studied because of their interesting magnetic properties, that are strongly dependent on the structure and molecular ordering of intercalated anions, as well as, the interlayer distance determined by them. Accordingly, the properties of those materials can be easily manipulated, such that can be considered tunable magnetic materials [34]. So, it is reported in this paper a new cheap and simple method for preparation of copper hydroxybromide, an interesting member of this class of layered materials. The infrared spectrum of copper hydroxyl bromide, Cu2(OH)3Br, compound has some characteristic vibrational modes which are expected in the IR spectrum. In the specific case of the metal-oxygen bond, medium peaks are expected between 496 and 407 cm‑1. Medium intensity vibrational modes associated to the Cu–O–H bond should appear in the interval at 815, 844 and 1110   cm-1 [35]. The narrow bands at 3523 and 3405 cm-1 corresponds to stretching symmetric and asymmetric OH groups. The frequency of the vibrational modes attributed to Cu–O–H bonds are depend on the degree of hydrogen bonding and were found at 777, 681 and 534 cm-1 [34]. In this study, the decomposition of coordinated carbamide in aqueous media at ~ 95 oC forming the new compound, [Cu2(OH)3Br may be understood as follows. It is well known [30, 36] that Cu(II) forms with urea the complex ion [Cu(urea)4]2+ at room temperature. Accordingly, in our case the parent complex [Cu(urea)4](Br)2 is formed. This parent complex may decompose at high temperature according to the following equation;

formula2

The reaction of nickel nitrate with urea in water was studied at 40° by the isothermal method [37]. The ternary solubility diagram of the Ni(NO3)2-Urea-H2O system is presented. The solid phases in the system have the compounds of Ni(NO3)2.2(NH2)2CO.2H2O, Ni(NO3)2.4(NH2)2CO, and Ni(NO3)2.10(NH2)2CO. All solubility of solid phases were determined at 30° and confirmed by an X-ray structural method. Complexes of N-ally urea (NAU) with cobalt(II) and nickel(II) halides and perchlorates have prepared and characterized by electrical conductance, magnetic susceptibility [38]. The infrared spectra of N-allyl urea complexes with Ni(II) and Co(II) salts, [Co(NAU)2X2]; (X= Cl, Br, and I), [Ni(NAU)4X2]; (X=Cl, Br), [Ni(NAU)4](ClO4)2 and [Ni(NAU)6](ClO4)2 are reported [39]. A negative shift in the frequencies of n(C=O) and d(NH2) bands, and a positive shift in the frequency of n(C-N) band, suggest that carbonyl oxygen is the donor site.

The infrared spectrum of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex clearly indicates the absence of bands due to the coordinated carbamide and the presence of very strong bands characteristic for isocyanate ions at 2220 ν(NCO) cm-1 and 644 δ(NCO) cm-1 [40] and for coordinated water at the 1629, 3642 and 3434 cm-1 respectively, for δ(H2O), nas(O-H) and ns(O-H) of H2O. At room temperature the nickel(II)-urea complex is formulated as [Ni(urea)4]2+ [37, 38]. At high temperature this complex may undergo the following reaction; where (X =Br).

formula3

Electron Spin Resonance

The ESR tool of analysis is useful in discuss the geometry and state of electrons in metal ion of the compounds. In this paper, the ESR spectrum of the Cu(II) compound (Fig. 2). The solid-state ESR spectra of some of the compounds exhibit axially symmetric g-tensor parameters with g||> g> 2.0023, indicating that the copper site has a dx2y2 ground-state characteristic of tetrahedral, square-planar, or octahedral stereochemistry. The g||> g for synthesized copper(II) hydroxylbromide, Cu2(OH)3Br, indicates a distorted octahedral. In axial symmetry, the G-values are given by Eq. 1.

G= (g||-2)/(g-2) = 4 → (1)

Fig. 2: ESR spectrum of Cu2(OH)3Br compound Figure2: ESR spectrum of Cu2(OH)3Br compound 


Click here to View figure

 

Where G is the exchange interaction parameter, according to literature, for the considerable exchange interaction process between Cu(II) centers in the solid state the value of G ≤ 4. The Giso. Value obtained for Cu(II) compound is estimated to be  2.3850  which satisfy the above mentioned parameter. The giso value was evaluated by using the relation giso = 1/3 g|| + 2/3 g, and these calculated values are in agreement with an orbital non-degenerate state.

The values of g|| were calculated for assigned arrows peaks in Fig.2 and found to be 1.934, 2.2512 and 3.0016 respectively.

This trend of increasing in g|| values was observed with V. P. Singh [41] who was studying the electronic and ESR spectra of Cu(II) halo-hydrazones complexes and  indicated that each complex  exhibits a six-coordinate tetragonally distorted octahedral geometry in the solid state and in DMSO solution. The  ESR spectra  of most of the Cu-complexes  reported in [41] are typically isotropic type at room temperature (300 K) in solid state as well as in DMSO solution. However, all the Cu-complexes  have the trend g|| > g, observed in all the complexes measured. The same trend was observed in Fig.2 all values of g|| > g which reflect that all axial position in the monoclinic crystal form of Cu2(OH)3Br are effectively by the magnetic field by ratio higher than those of perpendicular positions (g). The unusual behavior of isocyanate  and halide  complexes  of  copper (II) was repored by Chughtai et al. [42] were investigated the magnetic effects on the geometry of some salts of the isocyanato and halo-cuprate(II) anion involving tetraethylammonium and other bulky cations.

Table 1: Elemental analyses data of Mn(II), Cd(II), Mg(II) and Ca(II) carbonate compounds.

Compounds Color.

Elemental analyses/ Found (Calc.)

%C

%H

%Metal

% CO32–

Calc.

Found

Calc.

Found

Calc.

Found

Calc.

Found

Cu2(OH)3Br green 1.17 1.12 49.26 48.97
[Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] Light green 6.05 5.99 1.01 1.00 29.55 29.43
ZnCO3.H2O white 8.37 8.21 1.41 1.32 45.60 45.33 41.84 40.47

 

They proposed that the -N=C=O isocyanate and halo cuprate (II) entities are arrayed about the copper in a square planar (or pseudo octahedral) manner in the blue isomer and in a tetrahedral (though probably distorted tetrahedral) crystal form.

Table 2: Selective bond lengths and angles inside unit cell of Cu2(OH)3Br compound

atom1

atom2

d1-2

atom3

d1-3

angle^ 213°

Cu1

O3

1.9899

O3

1.9899

180.000

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

107.925

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

72.075

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

107.925

O1

2.3297

O1

2.3297

180.000

Cu2

Cu1

0.0000

O3

1.9899

0.000

Cu1

0.0000

O3

1.9899

0.000

Cu1

0.0000

O1

2.3297

0.000

Cu1

0.0000

O1

2.3297

0.000

O3

1.9899

O3

1.9899

180.000

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

72.075

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

107.925

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

107.925

O3

1.9899

O1

2.3297

72.075

O1

2.3297

O1

2.3297

180.000

O1

1.9004

O2

1.9173

105.366

O1

1.9004

Br1

2.1175

96.010

O2

1.9173

Br1

2.1175

156.476

Cu3

1.9004

Cu1

2.3297

99.545

 

X-Ray diffraction (XRD) and structural analysis measurements

The X-ray diffraction measurements (XRD) were carried out at room temperature on the fine ground powders of pure products resulted from reaction of metal bromide with urea in the range  (2θ =2-70o)  using Cu-Kα radiation source and a computerized X-ray diffractometer with two theta scan technique. The accurate analysis of XRD indicated that the first compound is Cu2(OH)3Br which has A2XY3 structure type with monoclinic crystal form as clear in Fig. 3. The lattice parameters were calculated and found to be a = 6.154, b = 6.813 and c = 9.114 Å for monoclinic structure of P121/c1 space group respectively. By the same technique the analysis of XRD of compound II resulted from reaction of zinc bromide with urea was found  ZnCO3.H2O  trigonal crystal structure with 32/m space group and lattice parameters a = 4.672 and c =  15.0199Å respectively as clear in assigned figure Fig. 3a.

Fig. 3: Experimental  X-ray diffractogram of the Cu2Br(OH)3 with A2XY3 type    structure  and P121/c1 space group Figure 3: Experimental  X-ray diffractogram of the Cu2Br(OH)3 with A2XY3 type structure and P121/c1 space group 


Click here to View figure

 

Fig. 3a: Experimental X-ray diffractogram of the ZnCO3.H2O with trigonal structure  and 3-2/m  space group Figure 3a: Experimental X-ray diffractogram of the ZnCO3.H2O with trigonal structure  and 32/m  space group 


Click here to View figure

 

The analysis of Fig.3b which describes experimental XRD-profile of polycrystalline phases exist together with nickel-complex proved that the highest figure of merit (F) was for monoclinic phase with P212121 space group. The last product produced from nickel bromide with urea reaction was formulated and confirmed to be [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex with rhombohedra unit cell with lattice parameters a =19.0711,  b=10.4231  and c = 8.9876 Å respectively and P212121 space group.

Fig.3b: Experimental X-ray diffractogram of the [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex Figure 3b: Experimental X-ray diffractogram of the [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex 


Click here to View figure

 

Structural visualization

Visualized studies of crystal structure were made by using Diamond Molecular Structure version 3.2 packages, Germany and Mercury 2.3-BUILD RC4-UK. A visualization study made is concerned by matching and comparison of experimental and   theoretical data of atomic positions, bond distances, oxidation states and   bond torsion on the crystal structure formed. The visualized studies for compound I (Cu2(OH)3Br) as model of urea precursor reactions confirmed that there are very good fitting between experimental XRD of Cu2(OH)3Br see Fig. 3a and visualized XRD-pattern Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: Visualized XRD-profile of Cu2Br(OH)3 with monoclinic crystal form Figure 4: Visualized XRD-profile of Cu2Br(OH)3 with monoclinic crystal form 

Click here to View figure

 

Table 2 displays some selective bond distances and angles inside unit cell of (Cu2(OH)3Br)  compound as it cleat there is two different types of copper atoms nominated as Cu1 and Cu2 ,three types of oxygen atoms symbolized as O1,O2 and O3 respectively .And finally only one type of bromide .One can observe that copper linked with oxygen recording 1.98 ,2.3297 ,1.91 Å for Cu1-O3,Cu2-O1 and Cu2-O1 respectively .These observations confirmed that there are more one oxidation state for copper which consistent and support ESR-data reported in the present manuscript.

Furthermore Figs. 5, 6   together with Table 2 confirm that the obtained compound I is hundred percent Cu2(OH)3Br with A2XY3 structure type and monoclinic crystal form.

Fig. 5: Unit cell of Cu2Br(OH)3 compound Figure 5: Unit cell of Cu2Br(OH)3 compound 


Click here to View figure

 

Fig. 6: Side view of super-lattice of Cu2Br(OH)3 and cluster formed with minimum 500 atoms Figure 6: Side view of super-lattice of Cu2Br(OH)3 and cluster formed with minimum 500 atoms 


Click here to View figure

 

Fig. 3b shows experimental polycrystalline XRD-profile recorded for [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex. It was notified that the most intense reflection peak is located at two theta ~ 42.22 with [214] Muller index. This peak has highest figure of merit (F) ~288.17 accompanied with maximum multiplicities = 8 respectively as shown and tabulated in Table.3 which shows also  some visualized selected XRD-diffraction data with its d-spacing inside unit cell of Ni-Isocyanate-Bromide complex.

Fig.7 shows the visualized XRD-profile of evaluated rhombohedra nickel-complex with intense diffraction peak lies at two theta value ~ 42.15° which is nearly identical to that induced in the experimental XRD-profile Fig.3b.

Fig.7: Rhomboheral visualized structure pattern for Nickel-complex Figure 7: Rhomboheral visualized structure pattern for Nickel-complex 


Click here to View figure

 

Fig.8 displays ball-stick and fill-space models for Ni-NCO-Br complex with minimum 78 atoms inside visualized unit cell of nickel-isocyanate-bromide complex .Furthermore 2x2x2 super unit cell was built up to confirm validity of rhombohedral structure of nickel complex [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2]  as stable valid structure form.

 Fig. 8: Ball-stick and space filling models for rhommohedral Nickel-Complex Figure 8: Ball-stick and space filling models for rhommohedral Nickel-Complex 

Click here to View figure

 

To complete visualization investigations with good fitting between theoretical and experimental studies many of structural parameters were analyzed carefully such as bond lengths, torsion on angles and symmetry operations.

Table 3: Some selected visualized XRD-data inside Ni-complex lattice

No

2q

d Å

F

h

k

l

Multi.

1

40.014

2.2515

174.46

3

4

1

8

2

40.041

2.2500

86.34

0

0

4

2

3

40.262

2.2381

174.29

8

1

1

8

4

40.333

2.2344

53.53

1

0

4

4

5

40.418

2.2299

127.87

0

3

3

4

6

40.518

2.2246

193.46

6

3

1

8

7

40.707

2.2147

125.94

1

3

3

8

8

40.753

2.2123

199.69

4

4

0

4

9

41.087

2.1951

339.81

0

1

4

4

10

41.198

2.1894

99.15

2

0

4

4

11

41.201

2.1893

128.27

5

3

2

8

12

41.278

2.1854

113.48

0

4

2

4

13

41.372

2.1806

39.05

1

1

4

8

14

41.427

2.1779

150.34

6

0

3

4

15

41.562

2.1711

209.58

1

4

2

8

16

41.566

2.1709

135.72

2

3

3

8

17

42.023

2.1483

83.48

4

4

1

8

18

42.086

2.1453

162.63

8

2

0

4

19

42.220

2.1388

288.17

2

1

4

8

20

42.397

2.1302

112.82

5

2

3

8

21

42.407

2.1298

65.14

2

4

2

8

22

42.445

2.1280

90.79

6

1

3

8

23

42.608

2.1202

10.56

3

0

4

4

24

42.874

2.1076

88.29

7

2

2

8

25

42.936

2.1048

162.07

7

3

0

4

26

42.967

2.1033

178.51

3

3

3

8

27

43.029

2.1004

14.73

8

0

2

4

28

43.286

2.0885

85.98

5

4

0

4

29

43.324

2.0868

98.15

8

2

1

8

30

43.603

2.0741

30.88

3

1

4

8

 

Tables 4a,4b describe some selected bond distances and  structural parameters of visualized [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex concerned by the two different types of nickel atoms inside unit cell of Ni-isocyanate- bromide complex symbolized as  Ni1 and Ni2 .

Table 4a: Selective bond lengths and angles for Nickel-type one inside crystal lattice of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex.

Atom1

Atom2

d1-2

Atom3

d1-3

Angle^ 213°

Ni1

O2

2.2163

O1

2.3540

85.828

O2

2.2163

O3

2.3788

95.915

O2

2.2163

O4

2.3805

81.709

O1

2.3540

O3

2.3788

99.428

O1

2.3540

O4

2.3805

89.254

O1

2.3540

O5

2.5380

166.246

O1

2.3540

O6

2.7991

124.131

O3

2.3788

O4

2.3805

170.837

O3

2.3788

O5

2.5380

80.488

O3

2.3788

O6

2.7991

82.229

O4

2.3805

O5

2.5380

91.781

O4

2.3805

O6

2.7991

95.371

O4

2.3805

C2

3.2780

95.466

O4

2.3805

C1

3.3074

107.172

O5

2.5380

O6

2.7991

42.121

O5

2.5380

C2

3.2780

82.690

O5

2.5380

N2

3.3262

121.033

O6

2.7991

C2

3.2780

123.912

O6

2.7991

C1

3.3074

102.946

O6

2.7991

N2

3.3262

82.627

C2

3.2780

C1

3.3074

125.474

C2

3.2780

N2

3.3262

136.858

C2

3.2780

Br2

3.5118

66.637

C1

3.3074

N2

3.3262

21.681

C1

3.3074

N3

3.4102

127.934

C1

3.3074

C3

3.4375

72.827

N2

3.3262

N3

3.4102

129.667

N2

3.3262

C3

3.4375

71.802

N2

3.3262

Br3

3.4409

69.972

N3

3.4102

C3

3.4375

58.067

N3

3.4102

Br3

3.4409

64.749

C3

3.4375

Br3

3.4409

20.550

C3

3.4375

C4

3.4695

169.096

C3

3.4375

Br2

3.5118

19.615

 

Table 4b: Selective bond lengths and angles for Nickel-type two inside crystal lattice of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex.

Atom1

Atom2

d1-2

Atom3

d1-3

Angle^ 213°

Ni2

O2

2.2163

O1

2.3540

85.828

O2

2.2163

O3

2.3788

95.915

O2

2.2163

O4

2.3805

81.709

O1

2.3540

O3

2.3788

99.428

O1

2.3540

O4

2.3805

89.254

O1

2.3540

O5

2.5380

166.246

O3

2.3788

O4

2.3805

170.837

O3

2.3788

O5

2.5380

80.488

O3

2.3788

O6

2.7991

82.229

O4

2.3805

O6

2.7991

95.371

O4

2.3805

C2

3.2780

95.466

O5

2.5380

O6

2.7991

42.121

O5

2.5380

C2

3.2780

82.690

O5

2.5380

C1

3.3074

142.688

O6

2.7991

C2

3.2780

123.912

O6

2.7991

C1

3.3074

102.946

O6

2.7991

N2

3.3262

82.627

C2

3.2780

C1

3.3074

125.474

C2

3.2780

N2

3.3262

136.858

C2

3.2780

N3

3.4102

20.883

C1

3.3074

N2

3.3262

21.681

N2

3.3262

Br3

3.4409

69.972

N3

3.4102

C3

3.4375

58.067

C3

3.4375

Br2

3.5118

19.615

Br3

3.4409

C4

3.4695

151.929

Br3

3.4409

Br2

3.5118

0.965

C4

3.4695

Br2

3.5118

152.889

 

As it clear from table. 4a Ni1 linked with six different types of oxygen atoms nominated as ( O1,O2,O3,O4,O5 and O6 ) recording bond lengths equal to 2.35 ,2.21 ,2.37 ,2.38,2.53 and 2.7 Å respectively . These data confirmed that the average density of positively charge focused on the nickel atoms (Ni1 ,Ni2) are varying as environmental neighboring atoms is changed [43,44,45,46,47 and 48] . Similar behavior was observed with nickel type two (Ni2) as reported and tabulated in Table. 4b.

Tables 5a,b,c are describing the bonding between different six oxygen atoms symbolized as O1,O2,O3,O4,O5 and O6 with other neighboring atoms.

Table 5a: Selective bond lengths and angles for oxygen-type one and two inside crystal lattice of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex.

Atom1

Atom2

d1-2

Atom3

d1-3

Angle^ 213°

O1

C1

1.5699

Ni1

2.3540

113.381

C1

1.5699

N2

2.4450

26.238

Ni1

2.3540

N2

2.4450

87.732

Ni1

2.3540

N1

2.5670

138.350

N2

2.4450

N1

2.5670

52.545

N1

2.5670

O2

3.1136

147.959

N1

2.5670

Br3

3.2513

88.778

O2

3.1136

Br3

3.2513

60.344

O2

3.1136

O4

3.3260

55.607

Br3

3.2513

Br2

3.3401

0.415

O4

3.3260

Br1

3.7856

68.950

O4

3.3260

C3

3.8837

104.240

Br2

3.3401

O3

3.6104

41.659

O3

3.6104

C3

3.8837

25.148

N2

3.7160

Br1

3.7856

55.508

N2

3.7160

C3

3.8837

124.003

Br1

3.7856

C3

3.8837

172.426

O2

C2

1.6985

Ni1

2.2163

113.050

C2

1.6985

N3

2.5538

24.073

C2

1.6985

N2

3.7713

144.904

C2

1.6985

O5

3.8485

78.412

Ni1

2.2163

N3

2.5538

90.987

Ni1

2.2163

N4

2.5826

137.048

Ni1

2.2163

O5

3.8485

38.872

N3

2.5538

N4

2.5826

49.096

N3

2.5538

O4

3.0096

119.498

N3

2.5538

O5

3.8485

61.597

 

Table 5b: Selective bond lengths and angles for oxygen-type three (O3) and four (O4) inside crystal lattice of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex.

Atom1

Atom2

d1-2

Atom3

d1-3

Angle^ 213°

O3

C3

1.6531

Ni1

2.3788

115.812

C3

1.6531

Br3

2.4697

26.193

Ni1

2.3788

Br3

2.4697

90.396

Ni1

2.3788

Br2

2.4844

92.434

Br3

2.4697

Br2

2.4844

2.101

Br3

2.4697

Br1

2.5914

53.881

Br2

2.4844

Br1

2.5914

51.780

Br2

2.4844

N3

3.0939

81.686

Br1

2.5914

N3

3.0939

85.186

N3

3.0939

O5

3.1788

66.971

N3

3.0939

O2

3.4143

45.881

O5

3.1788

O2

3.4143

71.321

O5

3.1788

O6

3.4195

33.825

O6

3.4195

N2

3.4224

72.863

O6

3.4195

Br2

3.4545

77.670

N2

3.4224

Br2

3.4545

79.334

Br2

3.4545

Br3

3.4892

1.406

Br3

3.4892

C1

3.7954

98.048

O1

3.6104

C2

3.6560

79.927

O1

3.6104

C1

3.7954

24.311

C2

3.6560

C1

3.7954

103.535

O4

C4

1.6867

Ni1

2.3805

116.044

Ni1

2.3805

O2

3.0096

46.781

Ni1

2.3805

N2

3.3206

104.291

O2

3.0096

N2

3.3206

72.947

O2

3.0096

O1

3.3260

58.617

O2

3.0096

O5

3.5333

71.549

O2

3.0096

O5

3.6483

109.215

O2

3.0096

N3

3.7248

112.789

N2

3.3206

O1

3.3260

67.984

O1

3.3260

O5

3.5333

90.105

O5

3.5333

O5

3.6483

112.165

N3

3.7248

N1

3.8015

107.084

N3

3.7248

O6

3.8405

73.985

 

Table 5c: Selective bond lengths and angles for oxygen-type five (O5) and six  (O6) inside crystal lattice of [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex

Atom1

Atom2

d1-2

Atom3

d1-3

Angle ^213°

O5

O6

1.9333

Ni1

2.5380

76.180

O6

1.9333

O3

3.1788

79.928

Ni1

2.5380

O3

3.1788

47.565

O3

3.1788

N3

3.4616

55.343

N3

3.4616

O4

3.5333

86.911

O4

3.5333

N1

3.6039

140.302

O4

3.5333

O4

3.6483

110.280

N1

3.6039

C2

3.8820

129.654

N1

3.6039

C4

3.9892

82.932

O4

3.6483

N3

3.7458

74.220

O2

3.8485

C2

3.8820

25.380

O2

3.8485

C4

3.9892

72.740

C2

3.8820

C4

3.9892

55.599

O6

O5

1.9333

Ni1

2.7991

61.700

O5

1.9333

O3

3.4195

66.246

Ni1

2.7991

O3

3.4195

43.573

Ni1

2.7991

O4

3.8405

38.107

O3

3.4195

O4

3.8405

81.382

O3

3.4195

C4

3.8459

103.848

O3

3.4195

Br1

3.8722

71.947

O3

3.4195

N1

3.9880

140.086

O4

3.8405

C4

3.8459

25.352

C4

3.8459

Br1

3.8722

125.685

C4

3.8459

N1

3.9880

81.126

Br1

3.8722

N1

3.9880

73.355

 

Accurate analysis of these tabulated data enhance to understand why [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex is stable and valid specially at the point of view in which torsion on angles inside unit cell still within normal ranges [44,46 and ,47]  recording minimum torsion (2.1° ) for angle Br2-O3-Br3 which is nearly linear and maximum is for C3-O1-Br1 which equal 172.4° , which is also very close to (180°) linear angle . As reported in [44,47] if the torsion on angle inside unit cell of crystal lattice within the normal range (5-10 %) of the angle value whatever the angle, is  enhancing  stability of the proposed structure .

Thermal analysis studies

The thermogravimetric analyses (TG/DTG/DSC) curves for the copper hydroxybromide, [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] and ZnCO3.xH2O in nitrogen atmosphere are illustrated in Figs 9. There is one step event leading to a total weight loss of 38% at 300 °C which attributed to the removal of hydrogen bromide and one water molecules. The final decomposition product was detected as copper(II) oxide. Also, The [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] complex has a sharp decomposition peak at 375 oC with weight loss about 24% due to the loss of the two coordinated water molecules, one nitrogen and on carbon monoxide molecules. The residual moieties consists of mixture from nickel(II) oxide and nickel(II) bromide contaminated with few carbon atoms. Additionally, Fig. 9 shows typical curves for thermogravimetric (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) of the decomposition of the zinc carbonated hydrate together with the mass spectra of the evolved gases at various temperatures. The thermal decomposition of the sample takes place in temperature ranges of 100-to-200 oC and 200-to-800 oC with mass loss corresponding to hydrated water molecules and carbon dioxide gas. Only the fragment ions of H2O and CO2 can be detected in the mass spectra during the course of the thermal decomposition.

 Fig. 9: TG/DTG/DSC curves of a- Cu2(OH)3Br, b- [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] and c- ZnCO3.H2O compounds Figure 9: TG/DTG/DSC curves of a- Cu2(OH)3Br, b [Ni2(NCO)2(H2O)2(Br)2] and c- ZnCO3.H2O compounds 

Click here to View figure

 

References

  1. Feldman, D.; Barbalata, A. “Synthetic Polymers”, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.
  2. Finar, I.L. “Organic Chemistry”, Longman group limited, London, 1973, p. 460.
  3. Rahman, M.J.; Bozadjiev, P.; Polovski, Y. Fert. Res. 1994, 38(2), 89.
  4. George, S.; Chellapandian, M.; Sivasankar, B.; Jayaraman, K. Bioprocess Eng. 1997, 16(2), 83.
  5. Wang, X.J.; Douglas, L.A. Agrochimica. 1996, 40(5-6), 209.
  6. Yerokun, O.A. S. Afr. J. plant soil. 1997, 14(2), 63.
  7. Heinig, R. SOFW J. 1996, 122(14), 998.
  8. Gnewuch, C.T.; Sosnovsky, G. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97(3), 829.
  9. Miyagawa, C.I. Drug Intell. & Clin. Pharma. 1986, 20, 527.
  10. Sugimura, M.; Kameyama, Y.; Hashimoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Muramatsu, M. Chem. Abs. 1990, 112, 63.
  11. Yamaguchi, A.; Miyazawa, T.; Shimanouchi, T.; Mizushima, S. Spectrochim. Acta. 1957, 10, 170.
  12. Stewart, J.E. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 248.
  13. Srivastava, P.C.; Aravindaksahn, C. Z. Phys. Chem. Leipzig. 1983, 264, 61.
  14. Schafer, M.; Curran, C. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 256.
  15. Zarli, B.; Dall’Olio, G.; Sindellari, L. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1976, 38, 491.
  16. Barbier, J.P.; Hugel, R.P. J. Inorg. Nucl, Chem. 1977, 39, 2283.
  17. Barbier, J.P.; Hugel, R. Inorg. Chimica Acta. 1974, 10, 93.
  18. Teleb, S.M.; Refat, M.S.; Sadeek, S.A. Ukrainian Chem. J. 2004, 68(5), 35.
  19. Sadeek, S.A.; Refat, M.S. J. Coord. Chem. 2005, 58(18), 1727.
  20. Sadeek, S.A.; Refat, M.S.; Teleb, S.M. J. Korea, Chem. Soc. 2004, 48(4), 358.
  21. Refat, M.S.; Teleb, S.M.; Sadeek, S.A. Spectrochim. Acta A, 2004, 60, 2803.
  22. Refat, M.S.; Sadeek, S.A.; Teleb, S.M. J. Argen. Chem. Soc. 2004, 92(4-6), 23.
  23. Refat, M.S. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 2004, 34(9), 1605.
  24. Nour, E.M.; Teleb, S.M.; Al-Khososy, N.A.; Refat, M.S. Synth. React. Inorg. Met-Org. Chem. 1997, 27(4), 505.
  25. Refat, M.S.; Sadeek, S.A. Latvian J. Chem. 2005, 4, 343.
  26. Refat, M.S.; Sadeek, S.A.; Nasr, D.E. Bull. Chem. Technolog. Maced. 2005, 24(2), 153.
  27. Teleb, S.M.; Refat, M.S. Bull. Chem. Technolog. Maced. 2006, 25(1), 57.
  28. Vogel, A.I. “Qualitative Inorganic Analysis”, John wiely & Sans, Inc. New York, 1987.
  29.  Nakamoto, K. “Infrared and Raman Spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds“, 3rd edn (New York: Wiley Interscience), 1978.
  30. Penland, R.B.; Mizushima, S.; Curran, C.; Quagliano, J.V. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1575.
  31. Yar, O.; Lessinger, L. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1995, C 51(11), 2282.
  32. Bruschini, C.S.; Hudson, M.J. Access in Nanoporous Materials; Pinnavaia, T.J.; Thorpe, M.F. eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1995, p. 161.
  33. Pereira, D.C.; de Faria, D.L.A.; Constantino, V.R.L.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 1651.
  34. Aguirre, J.M.; Gutiérrez, A.; Giraldo, O.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2011, 22(3), 546.
  35. Secco, E.; Worth, G. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 2504.
  36. Yamaguchi, A.; Miyazawa, T.; Shimanouchi, T.; Mizushima, S. Spectrochim. Acta. 1957, 10, 170.
  37. Boobekova, S.; Rysmendeev, K.R. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Estestv-Nauk. 1969, 3, 84.
  38. Singh, P.P.; Pande, I.M. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50, 2603.
  39. Davies, M.; Hallam, H.E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1950, 47, 1170.
  40.  Nakamoto, K. “Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, Part A Theory and Applications in Inorganic Chemistry“, Wiley, New York, 2009.
  41. Singh, V.P. Spectrochim Acta Part A. 2008, 71, 17-22.
  42. Chughtai, A.R.; Keller, R.N. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1969, 31, 633.
  43. Kawamura, M.; Shimada, S. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2007, 360, 2162.
  44. 44.  Elsabawy, K.M.;Refat, M.S. J. Comput. Meth. Molecular Design. 2011, 1(4), 1-13.
  45. Wozniak, K.; Krygowski, T.M.; Kariuki, B.; Jones, W.  J. Mol. Struct. 1991, 248, 331-343.
  46. Elsabawy, K.M. Cryogenics. 2011, 51, 452.
  47. Elsabawy, K.M.; El-Newehy, M.H. Appl. Surf. Science. 2011, 258, 1345.
  48. Sabolović, J.; Kaitner, B. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2008, 361(8), 2418.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.